Developing students’ skills into pedagogical improvisation using didactic games
Keywords:pedagogical improvisation, didactic game, pedagogical activitу, pilot study, experiment, student, university.
The aim of the study is to reveal ways in which to apply didactic games to the process of specialists’ mastering improvisation skills and problem-solving in professional pedagogical activity. Pedagogical improvisation encompasses the whole range of knowledge, abilities and skills the future teacher, may require to solve unplanned situations. However, the ability to make quick and expedient pedagogical decisions contributes to effective implementation, as this involves instantaneousness, extraordinary thinking and, most importantly, the effective final version. The research aim is formulated with the help of various scientific methods:
1) theoretical – theoretical and critical analysis of philosophical, psychological, pedagogical and methodical literature, comparison, systematization, generalization of the obtained information;
2) empirical – questionnaires, conversations, interviews, expert evaluation, independent evaluation, observation, pedagogical experiment;
3) statistical – mathematical methods for processing experimental data. The educational effect of pedagogical improvisation is achieved due to such teaching methods as didactic games, which are primarily related to two particulars of studying: problematicity and acquisition of study material through action. In order to ensure the development of future specialists’ skills of pedagogical improvisation, a pilot study was conducted, involving second-year students of the Ukrainian Studies Department of Pirogov National Medical University and of the Foreign Languages Department of Pavlo Tychyna Uman State Pedagogical University. The number of students measuring a high level of development in pedagogical improvisation increased by 12.3 %, with the average level increasing by 19.7 %. Of particular note, the number of students with low levels decreased by 32.0 %, due to educational didactic games. It was proven that these games ensured the students’ high activity in educational activities and encouraged them to develop their skills and responsible attitude towards their collective responsibilities in solving pedagogical problems situations.
Akimova, А.P. (1972). Formirovaniie u studentov tvorcheskikh umenii reshat pedagogicheskiie zadachi v oblasti vospitaniia [Developing students’ creative abilities to solve pedagogical problems in education]. Extended abstract of candidate's thesis. Leningrad: Russia [in Russian].
Bashkir, О.І. (2007). Sposoby formuvannia gotovnosti maibutnikh uchyteliv do pedagogichnoi improvizatsii [The ways to develop readiness of prospective teachers for pedagogical improvisation]. Pedagogika ta psykhologiia – Pedagogy and psychology, 32, 126–131 [in Ukrainian].
Ben-Horin, O. (2016). Towards a professionalization of pedagogical improvisation in teacher education. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1248186 [in English].
Buzzi, M.C., Buzzi, M., Perrone, E., Rapisarda, B. (2015). Didactic games for learning. Mondo Digitale, 14(58), 331–334 [in English].
Dezutter, S. (2011). Professional improvisation and teacher education: Opening the conversation. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Structure and improvisation in creative teaching, 27–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [in English].
Donmoyer, R. (1983). Pedagogical improvisation. Educational Leadership, 40, 39–43 [in English].
Kharkin, V.N. (1992). Pedagogicheskaia improvizatsiia: teoriia i metodika [Pedagogical improvisation: theory and methods]. Moscow: NB Magistr [in Russian].
Khomenko, O.O. (1994). Navchalni dilovi igry yak zasib formuvannia profesiinykh umin studentiv tehnikumiv i koledzhiv [Educational business games as the means for developing professional skills of students from technical schools and colleges]. Extended abstract of candidate's thesis. Kyiv: Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
Maheux, J.-F. & Lajoie, C. (2010). On improvisation in teaching and teacher education. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 8, 86–92 [in English].
Omelianenko, V.L., Kuzminskyi, A.I., & Vovk, L.P. (2006). Pedagogika: zavdannia i sytuatsii [Pedagogy: tasks and situations]. (2nd ed.). Kyiv: Znannia-Pres [in Ukrainian].
Shabalina, O., Malliarakis, C., Tomos, F., Balan, O.C., Alimov, A. (2016). Game-based learning as a catalyst for creative learning. Proceeding of the Eurorean Conference on games-based learning, 589–598 [in English].
Shchedrovitskii, G.P., & Kotelnikov, S.I. (1983). Organizatsionno-deiatelnostnaia igra kak novaia forma organizatsii i metod razvitiia kolektivnoi mysledeiatelnosti [Organizational and activity-based game as a new form of organization and method of development of collective thought activity]. Innovations in organizations, 33–53 [in Russian].
Copyright (c) 2019 O. M. Kobernyk, N. V. Kalashnik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors published in this journal agree to the following terms:
a) The authors reserve the right to author their work and grant the journal the right to first publish this work under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the published work with a mandatory link to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work therein magazine.
b) Authors have the right to enter into separate additional agreements regarding the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal (for example, posting work in an electronic repository of the institution or publishing as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work is maintained therein. magazine.
c) Journal policy permits and encourages the submission of manuscripts by the authors on the Internet (for example, in repositories of institutions or on personal websites), both prior to submitting this manuscript to the editorial board and as it contributes to the emergence of productive scientific discussion, and has a positive impact on the promptness and dynamics of citing a published work (see The Effect of Open Access).