A STUDY ON ENHANCING MANAGEMENT QUALITY OF DIVERSE STUDENT ACTIVITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS IN THE DIGITAL AGE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35433/pedagogy.1(124).2026.4

Keywords:

student activity management, digital governance, ecological governance, holistic education

Abstract

In the digital era, the management of student activities in higher education institutions faces structural dilemmas characterized by "prioritizing control over development" and "having platforms without ecosystems", necessitating a shift from transaction-based operations to value creation. Grounded in the theories of holistic education and digital governance, this study constructs a three-dimensional analytical framework of "data-scene-education" to systematically reveal the core contradictions in current management practices, including mismatches between supply and demand, disconnections between participation and experience, misalignments between evaluation and objectives, and separations between tools and humanity. The study proposes platform integration, scene-driven approaches, data profiling, and the return of the student as the subject as core pathways to facilitate the transition from fragmented management to ecological governance. It further puts forward a support system centered on organizational and institutional safeguards and the prevention of technological risks. This research provides a systematic theoretical perspective and practical pathways for improving the quality of student activity management in higher education institutions.

The article further substantiates strategies for enhancing the management of diverse student activities under conditions of digital transformation by integrating learner-centered education with digital governance. It demonstrates that the identified contradictions are systemic and reproduced through fragmented digitalization, requiring not only technological modernization but a reconstruction of managerial logic oriented toward data integration, goal alignment, experiential quality, and strengthened student agency. Strategic directions are proposed, including ecosystem-based resource integration, process-oriented digital assessment, the formation of a "digital portrait" of the student, and expanded co-participation in activity design, alongside organizational safeguards and mechanisms to prevent technocentrism and digital formalism.

References

Astin, A.W. (1999). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 40(5), 518-529 [in English].

Bergdahl, N., Fors, U., Hernwall, P., & Knutsson, O. (2018). The use of learning technologies and student engagement in learning activities. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 13(2), 113-130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2018-02-04 [in English].

Claxton, G., Costa, A.L., & Kallick, B. (2016). Hard thinking about soft skills. Educational Leadership, 73(6), 60-64. Retrieved from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1092939 [in English].

Seton Hall University. (2025). Continuing Education and Professional Studies launches Modern Campus to enhance student relationships and enrollment experience. Retrieved from: https://applicant.shu.edu/continuing-education/news/continuing-education-launches-modern-campus-for-students.html [in English].

Hrysai, Y. (2025). Digital tools in the management activities of general secondary education institutions. ScienceRise: Pedagogical Education, 2(63), 10-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2025.331116 [in English].

Pathify. (2025). Pathify expands campus experience platform with standalone communities’ solution. Retrieved from: https://pathify.com/news/pathify-expands-campus-experience-platform-with-standalone-communities-solution-2/ [in English].

Prakash, S. (2026). Role of digital technology in enhancing student engagement in classrooms. Naveen International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences, 2(3), 55-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.71126/nijms.v2i3.114 [in English].

Yaseen, H., Mohammad, A.S., Ashal, N., Abusaimeh, H., Ali, A., & Sharabati, A.-A.A. (2025). The impact of adaptive learning technologies, personalized feedback, and interactive AI tools on student engagement: The moderating role of digital literacy. Sustainability, 17(3), Article 1133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17031133 [in English].

Shanghai University. (2025). "One-Stop" student community: Digital intelligence empowers the community for more precise education. Retrieved from: https://yurenhao1.sizhengwang.cn/a/2025nsqfczshdyxcgzt_szfn/250910/2216681.shtml [in Chinese].

Yunnan University of Finance and Economics. (2025). Leading talent cultivation innovation with the "Three Types, Three Modes" model: Four educational teaching reform research projects granted provincial-level approval. Retrieved from: https://www.ynufe.edu.cn/jwcgb/info/1048/4781.htm [in Chinese].

Finance Sina. (2026). From "single-point application" to "comprehensive empowerment": Yunnan University of Finance and Economics’ self-developed "Educational Smart Brain". Retrieved from: https://finance.sina.cn/2026-01-28/detail-inhiwhqt7335974.d.html [in Chinese].

China Education Online. (2025). Jiamusi University Youth League Committee constructs a "four-dimensional drive" mechanism to create a new high ground for collaborative education in the "second classroom". Retrieved from: https://www.eol.cn/heilongjiang/hljgd/202512/t20251231_2713768.shtml [in Chinese].

School Department of the Central Committee of the Communist Youth League. (2018). Implementation guide for the second classroom transcript system in higher education institutions. Beijing: China Youth Publishing House [in Chinese].

Downloads

Published

2026-03-27

Issue

Section

EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES (METHODOLOGICAL PROBLEMS OF PEDAGOGY, HISTORY OF PEDAGOGY, ANDRAGOGY AND MANAGEMENT OF EDUCATIONAL