Methodology of Determination the Specified Coefficient of Experts’ Competence of the Scientific Activity Evaluation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35433/pedagogy.1(87).2017.123-128Keywords:
scientific activity, expert competence, evaluation, competence coefficient, monitoringAbstract
The problem of experts' selection is one of the most difficult in a theory and practice of expert researches. The selection only at a quality level does not always allow to form skilled expert group. Therefore the evaluation of the expert’s competence is more often carried out with the help of the special numerical index – coefficient of competence.
During the research, we used a comparative analysis, mathematical methods and special methods of experts’ quality evaluation: a priori, a posterior and tests.
Development of methodology of finding the specified coefficient of experts’ competence and expert group of the scientific activity evaluation became a result of undertaken study. In the article for the determination of the specified coefficient of competence there is the offered formula that takes into account data, determined to the beginning of the examination realization, namely – the level of professional preparation and being informed, the level of basic argumentation at making decision, personal internals of expert, the level of actions coordination with the members of working group, and includes the results of the special numerical index, calculated on the basis of the results of previous examinations (tours of expert evaluation).
This methodology was approved at Vinnitsa State Pedagogical University. The results of approbation showed a positive dynamics in relation to the increase of absolute values of basic indexes of competence and confirmed expediency of realization of several tours of expert evaluation. The offered methodology can be also used as auxiliary for realization of checked calculation in relation to validity of determination to the beginning of the examination realization of experts’ competence coefficient.
References
Suchasnyi tlumachnyi slovnyk ukrayins'koi movy [Dictionary of Modern Ukrainian Language] : 100 000 sliv / Za zah. red. d-ra filol. nauk, prof. V. V. Dubichyns'koho. – Kh. : VD ''ShKOLA'', 2009. – 1008 s.
Orlov A. I. Organizatsionno-ekonomicheskoie modelirovanie [Organizational and Economic Modelling] : [uchebnik : v 3 ch.] / A. I. Orlov. – М. : Izd-vo MGTU im. N. E. Baumana. – 2009. – Ch. 2 : Ekspertnyie otsenki. – 2011. – 486 s.
Davydenko Ye. O. Formalizatsiia protsesu formuvannia skladu ekspertnoi hrupy dlia analizu ryzykiv IT-proektiv [The Formalization of the Process for Forming an Expert Group to Analyze the Risks of IT-Projects] / Ye. O. Davydenko // Vestnik KhNTU [KNTU Newsletter]. – 2012. – №1 (44). – S. 163–168.
Myl'nyk V. V. Issledovaniie sistem upravleniia [Study of Management Systems] : [ucheb. posobie] [dlia vuzov] / Myl'nyk V. V., Titarenko B. P., Volochienko V. A.. – M. : Akademicheskii Proekt; Ekaterinburg : Delovaia kniga, 2003. – 352 s.
Litvak B. G. Ekspertnaia informatsiia : Metody polucheniia i analiza [Expert Information : Methods of Obtaining and Analysis] / B. G. Litvak. – M. : Radio i sviaz', 1982. – 184 s.
Kalinina I. O. Vrahuvannia kompetentnosti ekspertiv u metodakh bagatokruterial'nogo analizu v zadachakh ratsional'nogo vybory [Taking into Account the Competence of Experts in the Methods of Multi Analysis in the Problems of Rational Choice] / I. O. Kalinina, О. P. Gozhyi, G. О. Musenko // Naukovi pratsi Chornomors'kogo derzhavnogo universytetu imeni Petra Mohyly. Kompiuterni tekhnolohii [Petro Mohyla Black Sea National University Journal. Computer Technologies]. – 2012. – Vyp. 179, T. 191. – S. 116–123.
Lukicheva L. I. Upravlencheskiie resheniia [Management Decisions] : [uchebn.] / L. I. Lukicheva, D. I. Egorichev. – M. : Omega-L, 2009. – 383 s.
Raihman E. P. Ekspertnyie metody v otsenke kachestva tovarov [Expert Methods to Evaluate the Quality of the Goods] / E. P. Raihman, G. G. Azgaldov. – M. : Ekonomika, 1974. – 151 s.
Postnikov V. M. Analiz podkhodov k formirovaniiu sostava ekspertnoi gruppy, orientirovannoi na podgotovku i prinyatie reshenii [Analysis of Approaches to Formation of Expert Group Membership Focused on Preparing and Making Decisions] [Elektronnyi resurs] / V. M. Postnikov // Nauka i obrazovanie. MGTU im. N. E. Baumana. Elektron. zhurn [Science and Education. Scientific Edition of Bauman MSTU. Electronic Journal]. – 2012. – № 5. –
S. 333–346. – Rezhim dostupu do zhurn. : http://technomag.edu.ru/doc/360728.html.
Podolianchuk S. V. Vyznachennia kompetentnosti ekspertiv z otsinyuvannia naukovoi diyal'nosti u vyshchomu pedahohichnomu navchal'nomu zakladi [Competence Determination of Experts of the Assessment of Research Activities in the Higher Pedagogical Educational Establishment] / S. V. Podolianchuk // Teoriya i praktyka upravlinnya sotsial'nymy systemamy [Control Theory and Practice of the Social Systems]. – 2014. – № 4. – S. 112–122.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors published in this journal agree to the following terms:
a) The authors reserve the right to author their work and grant the journal the right to first publish this work under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the published work with a mandatory link to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work therein magazine.
b) Authors have the right to enter into separate additional agreements regarding the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal (for example, posting work in an electronic repository of the institution or publishing as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work is maintained therein. magazine.
c) Journal policy permits and encourages the submission of manuscripts by the authors on the Internet (for example, in repositories of institutions or on personal websites), both prior to submitting this manuscript to the editorial board and as it contributes to the emergence of productive scientific discussion, and has a positive impact on the promptness and dynamics of citing a published work (see The Effect of Open Access).