THE RECEPTION OF AN INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH IN SCIENTIFIC THOUGHT

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35433/pedagogy.3(114).2023.16-28

Keywords:

interdisciplinarity, interdisciplinary approach, disciplinary approach, higher education system, scientific research, scientific discourse

Abstract

The article examines the degree of study of the interdisciplinary approach in foreign and Ukrainian scientific discourse based on the material of publications of the second half of the 20th – beginning of the 21st century. It is noted that the appearance of a large amount of research works is due to the complexity and multifaceted nature of the phenomenon.

The study traces the formation of the idea of interdisciplinarity, starting from the 70s of the XX century in the works of L. Apostel, H. Berger, M. Boisot, A. Briggs, P. Duguet, H. Heckhausen, E. Jantsch, J. T. Klein, J. Kockelmans, A. Lichnerowicz, G. Michaud, M. Nissani, J. Piaget and others. It was found that the first works focused on understanding the essence of the concept, searching for a comprehensive definition, developing classifications, distinguishing the advantages of an interdisciplinary approach compared to a disciplinary one, studying their connection and interdependence, predicting the future of the concept, etc. Attempts to present the application of the interdisciplinary approach in practice in the works of L. De Greef, G. Post, C. Vink, and L. Wenting were also considered.

In the research process, theoretical (analysis and synthesis, systematization, generalization of scientific literature) and comparative (comparison of different ideas and opinions on the problem) methods were applied. The conclusion states that the understanding of the interdisciplinary approach in the context of scientific research and the higher education system has intensified in the foreign scientific discourse. The scientists focused on the study of the theoretical dimension of the problem and the practical application of the acquired knowledge: the development of programs and projects to solve urgent scientific and educational issues. It is also noted that Ukrainian researchers, relying on the experience of foreign colleagues, are making attempts to develop models of application of the ideas of interdisciplinarity in the education system, and this contributes to the improvement of the domestic educational process.

References

Ahapova, O. (2022). Mizhdystsyplinarnist v ukrainskomu doslidnytskomu prostori yak dominanta naukovykh innovatsii [Interdisciplinarity in the Ukrainian research space as a dominant factor in scientific innovation]. Ukrainskyi doslidnytskyi prostir v umovakh viiny: Adaptatsiia y perezavantazhennia tekhnichnykh i yurydychnykh nauk – Ukrainian research area in the conditions of military intervention: adaptability and update of the technical and legal sciences. Kharkiv-Riga, 34-36 [in Ukrainian].

Zhelanova, V. (2021). Vprovadzhennia stratehii mizhdystsyplinarnosti v suchasnii vyshchii osviti [Implementation of interdisciplinary strategy in modern higher education]. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho universytetu. Seriia: "Pedahohika. Sotsialna robota" – Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod University. Series: "Pedagogy. Social Work", vyp. 1 (48), 477-480 [in Ukrainian].

Ishchenko, A. (2022a). Mizhdystsyplinarnyi pidkhid yak priorytetna stratehiia rozvytku vyshchoi osvity v krainakh YeS [Interdisciplinary approach as a priority strategy for higher education development in EU countries]. Pedahohichni nauky: teoriia, istoriia, innovatsiini tekhnolohii: naukovyi zhurnal – Pedagogical Sciences: Theory, History, Innovative Technologies. The Scientific Journal, 2 (116), 255-266 [in Ukrainian].

Ishchenko, A. (2022b). Mizhdystsyplinarnyi pidkhid u pidhotovtsi mahistriv: dosvid proiektiv prohramy Erazmus+ [Interdisciplinary approach in master’s training: the experience of the Erasmus+ program projects]. Pedahohichni nauky: teoriia, istoriia, innovatsiini tekhnolohii: naukovyi zhurnal – Pedagogical Sciences: Theory, History, Innovative Technologies. The Scientific Journal, 3 (117), 274-286 [in Ukrainian].

Kolot, A. (2014). Mizhdystsyplinarnyi pidkhid yak dominanta rozvytku ekonomichnoi nauky ta osvitnoi diialnosti [Interdisciplinary approach as dominant of the development of economic science and educational activity]. Retrieved from: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/32609714.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Nechytailo, I. (2020). Mizhdystsyplinarnist yak osnova rozvytku suchasnoho universytetu ta yoho osvitnikh prohram. [Interdisciplinarity as a basis for the development of a modern university and its educational programs]. Shliakh uspikhu i perspektyvy rozvytku (do 26 richnytsi zasnuvannia Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav – The path of success and prospects for development (to the 26th anniversary of the founding of the Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs). 369-372 [in Ukrainian].

Ohneviuk, V., Protsenko, O., & Melnychenko, O. (2021). Mizhdystsyplinarnyi pidkhid u profesiinii pidhotovtsi zdobuvachiv vyshchoi osvity v umovakh mahistratury (na prykladi navchalnoi dystsypliny "Osvitolohiia") [Interdisciplinary approach in the training of master's degree students (on the example of the course "Educology")]. Educological discourse, 2 (33), 1-15 [in Ukrainian].

Vozniuk, O.V. (2012). Pedahohichna synerhetyka: heneza, teoriia i praktyka: monohrafiia. [Pedagogical synergetics: genesis, theory and practice: monograph]. Zhytomyr: Ivan Franko State University Publishing House [in Ukrainian].

Apostel, L., Berger, G., Briggs, A., & Michaud, G. (1972). Interdisciplinarity. Teaching and Research Problems in the Universities. Paris: OECD/Centre for Educational Research and Innovation [in English].

Bailis, S. (2002). Interdisciplinary Curriculum Design and Instructional Innovation: Notes on the Social Science Programme at San Francisco State University. In: Haynes, C. (ed.). Innovations in Interdisciplinary Teaching. Washington, DC: American Council on Education / Oryx Press, 3-15 [in English].

Bechtel, W. (1986). The Nature of Scientific Integration. Integrating Scientific Disciplines. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoof [in English].

Boisot, M. (1972). Discipline and interdisciplinarity. In: L. Apostel, et al. (eds.). Interdisciplinarity: Problems of Teaching and Research in Universities. Paris: OECD, 89-97 [in English].

Brewer, D.G. (1995). Environmental Challenges: Interdisciplinary Opportunities and New Ways of Doing Business. The 1995 MISTRA Lecture. Stockholm: MISTRA [in English].

Chettiparamb, A. (2007). Interdisciplinarity: A literature review. Report of Interdisciplinary Teaching and Learning Group, Subject Centre for Languages, Linguistics and Area Studies. University of Southampton [in English].

De Greef, L., Post, G., Vink, C., Wenting, L. (2017). Designing Interdisciplinary Education. Amsterdam University Press B.V.: Amsterdam [in English].

De Zure, D. (1999). Interdisciplinary Teaching and Learning. Retrieved from: https://podnetwork.org/content/uploads/V10-N4-DeZure.pdf [in English]

Frodeman, R., Klein, J.T., & Pacheco, R.C.S. (2017). The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. Oxford University Press [in English].

Gabelnick, F. (2002). Conclusion: Achieving Interdisciplinary Innovation: Leading and Learning in Community. In: Haynes, C. (ed.). Innovations in Interdisciplinary Teaching Washington: American Council on Education / Oryx Press, 275-290 [in English].

Hansson, B. (1999). Interdisciplinarity: For What Purpose? Policy Sciences, 32, 339-343 [in English].

Heckhausen, H. (1972). Discipline and Interdisciplinarity. In: L. Apostel, et al. (ed.). Interdisciplinarity: Problems of Teaching and Research in Universities. Paris: OECD, 83-89 [in English].

Karlqvist, A. (1999). Going Beyond Disciplines: The Meanings of Interdisciplinarity. Policy Sciences, 32 (4), 379-383 [in English].

Klein, J.T. (2000). A Conceptual Vocabulary of Interdisciplinary Science. In: Weingart, P. & Stehr, N. (eds.). Practising Interdisciplinarity. London: University of Toronto Press, 3-24 [in English].

Klein, J.T. (2021). Beyond interdisciplinarity: Boundary work, communication, and collaboration in the 21st century. New York, NY: Oxford University Press [in English].

Klein, J.T. (1996). Crossing boundaries: Knowledge, disciplinarities, and interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia [in English].

Klein, J.T. (2005). Humanities, culture and interdisciplinarity. Albany: State University of New York Press [in English].

Klein, J.T. (2004). Interdisciplinarity and complexity: An evolving relationship. CO Special Double Issue Vol. 6, Nos. 1-2, 2-10 [in English].

Klein, J.T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press [in English].

Klein, J.T., Grossenbacher, W., Haberli, R., Bill, A., Scholz, R.W., & Welti, M. (eds). (2001). Transdisciplinarity: Joint problem solving among science, technology, and society: An effective way for managing complexity. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhauser Verlag [in English].

Kockelmans, J.J. (1979). Why interdisciplinarity? In: J.J. Kockelmans (ed.). Interdisciplinarity in higher education. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 123-160 [in English].

Levin, L., & Lind, I. (1985). Interdisciplinarity Revisited – Re-assessing the Concept in the Light of Institutional Experience. Stockholm: Liber [in English].

Miller, Raymond, C. (2010). Interdisciplinarity: Its Meaning and Consequences. In: Robert A. Denemerk (ed.). The International Studies Encyclopedia. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, vol. VI, 3900-3915 [in English].

Mills, D., & Huber, M. (2005). Anthropology and the Educational "Trading Zone": Disciplinarity, Pedagogy and Professionalism. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 4 (1), 9-32 [in English].

Rosamond, B. (2006). Disciplinarity and the Political Economy of Transformation: The Epistemological Politics of Globalisation Studies. Review of International Political Economy, 13 (3), 516-532 [in English].

UNESCO. (1986). Interdisciplinarity in General Education. A study by Louis d'Hainaut following an International Symposium on Interdisciplinarity in General Education held at Unesco Headquarters from 1 to 5 July 1985 [in English].

UNESCO. (1983). Interdisciplinarity in Higher Education. European Centre for Higher Education. Bucharest [in English].

UNESCO. (1970). Seminar on the training of teachers for and through interdisciplinarity. Cоte d’Ivoire, 24 March – 4 April 1970. Final Report. Paris, Unesco [in English].

Downloads

Published

2023-10-20