SIMULATION OF THE PROCESS OF FORMATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF PEDAGOGICAL MASTERY IN PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHERS (BASED ON THE EXPERIENCE OF PAVLYSH SECONDARY SCHOOL)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35433/pedagogy.1(116).2024.1

Keywords:

pedagogical mastery, future primary school teacher., professional knowledge, pedagogical abilities, pedagogical interaction, humanism, teacher's personality

Abstract

The article contains a procedure for simulating the process of formation and development of the pedagogical mastery in a primary school teacher (based on the experience of the Pavlysh secondary school). The corresponding model consists of a methodological block (it implements scientific approaches and corresponding principles – integrity, continuity and secession, individualization and differentiation, scientificity, innovation, professional and pedagogical self-improvement), a content block (reflects the content of the development of pedagogical mastery in primary school teachers, which covers three main components: love for the child (the humanistic orientation), pedagogical abilities (professional competence, pedagogical experience, pedagogical technique) and pedagogical interaction (pedagogical culture, personal qualities), an organizational and activity block (includes certain pedagogical conditions: systematic deepening of teachers' knowledge; creative development of advanced pedagogical experience, systematic self-analysis, creation of one's own methodical laboratory, harmonious atmosphere in the educational institution, free time for self-education), a diagnostic and resultative block (reflects criteria for evaluating the level of development of pedagogical mastery in primary school teachers).

It was found out that, according to V. Sukhomlynsky, the elements of pedagogical mastery of a primary school teacher are humanism, pedagogical abilities, and pedagogical interaction. Besides the professional knowledge, the knowledge of psychology (as a basis for understanding age and individual characteristics, the richness of methods of studying a child) and perfect mastery of a native language (as a basis for developing pupils' speech competence and forming a citizen) are important. Also, the important didactic skills of the primary school teacher are determined: the ability to teach to learn, to think, to work independently; to create situations of success; to predict the result of education and upbringing, its possible difficulties. Under such conditions, a teacher should be a standard for pupils, so his/her pedagogical culture and a high level of emotional intelligence development are important.

References

Vozniuk, O.V. (2015). Zahalna teoriia system ta yii pedahohichni proektsii. Profesiina pedahohichna osvita: systemni doslidzhennia [General theory of systems and its pedagogical projections. Professional pedagogical education: systematic studies]. Zhytomyr: Vyd-vo ZhDU im. I. Franka, 29-67 [in Ukrainian].

Dubaseniuk, O.A. (2010). Metod kontent-analizu u systemi psykholoho-pedahohichnykh doslidzhen. Metodolohiia naukovoi diialnosti: navch. posibnyk [The method of content analysis in the system of psychological and pedagogical research. Methodology of scientific activity: study guide]. Vinnytsia: Vyd-vo AMSKP, 200-221 [in Ukrainian].

Kovalchuk, V. (2011). Pedahohichna maisternist vykladacha – osnova yoho kompetentnosti [The teacher's pedagogical mastery is the basis of his competence]. Profesiino-tekhnichna osvita – Vocational and technical education: nauk.-metod. zhurnal, № 6(30), 22-34 [in Ukrainian].

Lutsiuk, A.M. (2011). Vasyl Sukhomlynskyi pro pedahohichnu maisternist uchytelia pochatkovoi shkoly [Vasyl Sukhomlynskyi about the pedagogical skill of a primary school teacher]. Pedahohichnyi dyskurs – Pedagogical discource, vyp. 10, 297-301 [in Ukrainian].

Mykhailov, V.M. (2021). Pedahohichne modeliuvannia rozvytku profesiinoi kompetentnosti fakhivtsiv iz pytan tsyvilnoi bezpeky v systemi pisliadyplomnoi osvity [Pedagogical modeling of the development of professional competence of civil security specialists in the postgraduate education system]. Akademichni studii. Seriia "Pedahohika" – Academic studies. Series "Pedagogy", 1(3), 50-58 [in Ukrainian].

Osadchyi, I.H. (2016). Pedahohichne modeliuvannia: shcho vazhlyvo znaty pedahohu? [Pedagogical modeling: what is important for a teacher to know?]. Narodna osvita – Public education, vyp. 1, 60-68 [in Ukrainian].

Ponomarov, O.S., Sereda, N.V., & Chebotarov, M.K. (2015). Modeliuvannia diialnosti fakhivtsia [Modeling the activity of a specialist]. Kharkiv: NTU "KhPI", 58 [in Ukrainian].

Skorobohatova, M.R. (2009). Modeli pidhotovky vchyteliv pochatkovykh klasiv u vyshchii shkoli Ukrainy [Models of primary school teacher training in higher education in Ukraine]. Visnyk Cherkaskoho universytetu. Seriia Pedahohichni nauky – Bulletin of the Cherkasy university. Series Pedagogical sciences, vyp. 148, 50-55 [in Ukrainian].

Stechenko, D.M., & Chmyr, O.S. (2005). Metodolohiia naukovykh doslidzhen [Methodology of scientific research]. Kyiv: Znannia, 309 [in Ukrainian].

Stoliarenko, O.V. (2015). Modeliuvannia pedahohichnoi diialnosti u pidhotovtsi fakhivtsia [Modeling of pedagogical activity in the training of a specialist]. Vinnytsia: TOV "Nilan-LTD", 196 [in Ukrainian].

Surmin, Yu.P. (2006). Maisternia vchenoho: pidruchnyk dlia naukovtsia [A scientist's workshop: a textbook for a scientist]. Kyiv: Konsortsium z udoskonalennia menedzhment-osvity v Ukraini, 302 [in Ukrainian].

Sukhomlynska, O.V. (2013). Shkola Sukhomlynskoho u Pavlyshi – pohliad kriz pryzmu chasu [Sukhomlynsky School in Pavlysh – a view through the prism of time]. Kyiv: Pedahohichna dumka, 122 [in Ukrainian].

Sukhomlynskyi, V.O. (1976). Pavlyska serednia shkola [Pavlysh secondary school]: Vybrani tvory v 5 tomakh. Kyiv, T. 4, 7-390 [in Ukrainian].

Tsiuniak, O. (2021). Profesiina pidhotovka maibutnikh vchyteliv pochatkovykh klasiv v umovakh tsyfrovoi transformatsii osvity [Professional training of future primary school teachers in conditions of digital transformation of education]. Ivano-Frankivsk, 316 [in Ukrainian].

Akselbo, I., Killingberg, H., & Aune, I. (2020). Simulation as a pedagogical learning method for critical paediatric nursing in Bachelor of Nursing programmes: a qualitative study. Advances in Simulation, 5, 24 DOI: 10.1186/s41077-020-00140-2 [in English].

Aldrich, Clark. (2003). A field guide to educational simulations. Learning Circuits. American Society for Training and Development. January, 2003 [in English].

Campbell, T., Oh, P.S., Maughn, M., Kiriazis, N., & Zuwallack, R. (2015). A Review of Modeling Pedagogies: Pedagogical Functions, Discursive Acts, and Technology in Modeling Instruction. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(1), 159-176. DOI: 10.12973/eurasia.2015.1314a [in English].

Cockerill, A. (1999). Each One Must Shine: The Educational Legacy of V.A. Sukhomlinsky. Peter Lang Inc., International Academic Publishers; New edition, 230 [in English].

Gibbons, A.S. (2001). Model-Centered Instruction. Journal of Structural Learning and Intelligent Systems, 14, 511-540 [in English].

Hristov, H., Yonchev, E., & Tsvetkov, V. (2022). Modelling of pedagogical patterns through E-learning objects. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 89(3), 121-130. DOI: 10.33407/ITLT.V89I3.4859 [in English].

Downloads

Published

2024-03-30