DEVELOPMENT OF THE ABILITY OF FUTURE DOCTORAL LEVEL SPECIALISTS TO IMPLEMENT AN INDIVIDUAL EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH TRAJECTORY: CONTOURS OF PEDAGOGICAL DISCOURSE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35433/pedagogy.2(117).2024.14

Keywords:

doctoral level higher education student, individual educational and scientific trajectory, research activity, self-realization, self-regulation, competence approach

Abstract

The article highlights some of the results of the conducted pedagogical discourse regarding the development of postgraduate students' ability to realize an individual educational and scientific trajectory; the latter is considered as a factor in the formation of image features of the future scientist. The exceptional importance of the goal-oriented process of forming the individual educational trajectory of a PhD student is substantiated; it is about the decisive factor in the success of personalized mastery as both an educational and a scientific component of post-graduate training, as well as about the optimality of professional support for the preparation of the applicant's own dissertation project, which, as a rule, is characterized by originality both at the level of the topic and from the perspective of tools for solving key contradictions, which increase the relevance of the research problem raised by him, in the aspect of the spectrum of manifestation of the creative individuality of the future Doctor of Philosophy. In particular, the constructive Polish experience in terms of stimulating personal and professional activity and increasing the personal responsibility of the scientific supervisor of graduate students is taken into account (during the fourth semester of study, Polish doctoral students undergo an intermediate certification before a commission, which must include a doctor with a habilitation or a professor from the scientific specialty chosen by the graduate student, and does not work at the institution where postgraduate training of the future doctor of philosophy takes place; in case of successful attestation of the applicant, his postgraduate scholarship is significantly increased). It was established that the historical and pedagogical origins of the chosen approach are laid in the fundamental research of the construct "measures of European success – a chance for Ukraine". As for modern scientific and pedagogical ideas about the content of the concept of "individual educational trajectory", it is noted that such diverse dimensions as: "path", "style", "and program" and "movement" are emphasized. It has been proven that for graduate students, it is legitimate to leave an individual educational and scientific trajectory, where attention is mainly focused on the processes of self-realization and self-regulation. Subjective self-realization is interpreted as the manifestation of a specific form of activity by the student, aimed at acquiring the status of a subject of his own development in the field of the chosen profession. As for self-regulation, it is understood as an important aspect of self-improvement of the future Doctor of Philosophy, because it occurs through the involvement of mechanisms of self-evaluation, self-control, and reflection; the activity of professional self-regulation is both directly and indirectly related to the process of self-creation. Therefore, the ability of the acquirer to "be" simultaneously in the content of formal, non-formal, and informal education is assumed.

References

Hodovaniuk, T. (2010). Indyvidualne navchannia u vyshchii shkoli [Individual learning in higher education]: monohrafiia. Кyiv, 160 [in Ukrainian].

Zadorozhna-Kniahnytska, A.V. (2020). Formuvannia indyvidualnoi osvitnoi traiektorii mahistriv – maibutnikh menedzheriv osvity u protsesi profesiinoi pidhotovky [Formation of individual educational trajectory of masters – future education managers in the process of professional training]. Innovatsiina pedahohika – Innovative pedagogy, is. 20, t. 1, 125-129 [in Ukrainian].

Kichuk, N.V. (2023). Sformovanist u maibutnoho fakhivtsia naukovo-pedahohichnoho styliu myslennia – peredumovy yoho zdatnosti do osvitnikh innovatsii [Formation of the future specialist's scientific and pedagogical style of thinking – prerequisites for his ability to educational innovation]. Osvitni innovatsii v zakladakh osvity: problemy ta perspektyvy – Educational innovations in educational institutions: problems and prospects: zb. st. Izmail, 41-43 [in Ukrainian].

Koliada, N., Kravchenko, O., & Koliada, T. (2022). Mizhnarodnyi dosvid pidhotovky doktoriv filosofii z sotsialnoi roboty [International experience of training doctors of philosophy in social work]. Sotsialna robota ta sotsialna pedahohika – Social work and social pedagogy, is. 2(9), 310-327 [in Ukrainian].

Onovlennia standartiv vyshchoi osvity dlia rozshyrennia mozhlyvostei zdiisnennia pidhotovky molodizhnykh pratsivnykiv (prohrama USATD "Detsentralizatsiia prynosyt krashchi rezultaty ta efektyvnosti (DOBRE)"). Dokument z propozytsiiamy ta rekomendatsiiamy [Updating Higher Education Standards to Expand Youth Worker Training Opportunities (USATD Decentralisation Offering Better Results and Efficiency (DOBRE) Programme). A document with proposals and recommendations / rozr. S. Borodin. (2024). Кyiv, 44 [in Ukrainian].

Reformatsiia: uspikh Yevropy i shans Ukrainy [Reformation: Europe's success and Ukraine's chance]: kol. monohrafiia / za red. R. Shermety ta O. Romanenko. (2017). Kyiv: Sammit – knyhy, 256 [in Ukrainian].

Sushchenko, L.O. (2014). Teoretychni i metodychni zasady orhanizatsii naukovo-doslidnoi roboty maibutnikh pedahohiv u vyshchykh navchalnykh zakladakh [Theoretical and methodological principles of organising research work of future teachers in higher education institutions]. Extended abstract of Doctor`s thesis. Кyiv, 40 [in Ukrainian].

Talanova, Zh.V. (2010). Doktorska pidhotovka u sviti ta Ukraini [Doctoral training in the world and Ukraine]: monohrafiia. Kyiv: Millnium, 476 [in Ukrainian].

Downloads

Published

2024-06-27