CRITERIA AND LEVELS OF PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE OF FUTURE IT PROFESSIONALS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35433/pedagogy.2(121).2025.13

Keywords:

professional competence, IT specialists, criteria, indicators, levels of formation, criterion-indicator system, e-CF, pedagogical assessment

Abstract

The article reveals approaches to determining criteria and indicators for measuring the levels of professional competence of future IT specialists in the conditions of the information and educational environment of a higher education institution. The review of scientific and pedagogical literature on the construction of criterion-indicator systems is carried out and the requirements for their formation are substantiated. It is determined that the criteria must comply with the principles of materiality, consistency, validity, measurability and verifiability. Given the analysis of European educational standards and frameworks (European e-Competence Framework, EQF, CDIO Syllabus, Computing Curricula 2020, etc.), a criterion-indicator system for assessing the professional competence of IT specialists is proposed. The system identifies four criteria: cognitive and content, operational and activity, professional and communicative, and ethical and value. For each criterion, a system of quantitative indicators has been developed that allow diagnosing the level of professional competence. A 5-level scale for assessing professional competence for each indicator and a method for calculating the integral indicator of the level of professional competence are presented. In accordance with the e-CF scale, the levels of professional competence from performing tasks under supervision (e-1) to initiating innovations (e-5) are substantiated. The proposed system is the basis for further pedagogical measurements within the framework of an experimental study of the influence of educational factors on the formation of professional competence of future IT specialists.

References

Annenkova, I.P., Kuznetsova, N.V., & Raskola, L.A. (2021). Osnovy pedahohichnykh vymiryuvanʹ [Fundamentals of pedagogical measurements]. Odesa: Odesʹkyy natsionalʹnyy universytet im. I.I. Mechnykova, 210 [in Ukrainian].

Bashkir, O.I. (2020). Metodolohiya naukovo-pedahohichnoho doslidzhennya ta prezentatsiya yoho rezulʹtativ [Methodology of scientific and pedagogical research and presentation of its results]. Kharkiv: Kharkiv. nats. ped. un-t imeni H.S. Skovorody, 93 [in Ukrainian].

European Qualifications Framework (EQF). Retrievsd from: https://europa.eu/europass/en/european-qualifications-framework-eqf [in English].

Kovalchuk, L. (2020). Modeliuvannia naukovo-pedahohichnykh doslidzhen [Modeling of scientific and pedagogical research]. Lviv: Vydavnychyi tsentr LNU imeni Ivana Franka, 520 [in Ukrainian].

Metodolohiya pedahohichnoho doslidzhennya [Methodological foundations of pedagogical research]: monohrafiya / ed. by V.S. Kurylo, E.M. Khrykov. (2013). Luhans`k: Derzhavnyy zaklad "Luhansʹkyy natsionalʹnyy universytet imeni Tarasa Shevchenka", 248 [in Ukrainian].

Yagupov, V., Yergidzei, K., & Rozumovska, Y. (2024). Kryteriyi ta pokaznyky diahnostuvannya rozvynenosti informatsiyno-komunikatsiynoyi kompetentnosti ofitseriv taktychnoyi lanky upravlinnya [Criteria and indicators for diagnosing the development of information and communication competence of tactical command officers]. Aktualʹni pytannya humanitarnykh nauk – Topical Issues of the Humanities, is. 77, vol. 3, 316-328. DOI: 10.24919/2308-4863/77-3-43 [in Ukrainian].

CDIO Syllabus 2.0. Retrievsd from: http://www.cdio.org/benefits-cdio/cdio-syllabus [in English].

Computing Curricula. (2020). (CC2020). Retrievsd from: https://www.acm.org/education/curricula-recommendations [in English].

ENQA/ESG – Standards and guidelines for quality assurance in the European Higher Education Area Retrievsd. from: https://enqa.eu/index.php/home/esg/ [in English].

European e-Competence Framework 3.0 (e-CF). Retrievsd from: https://esco.ec.europa.eu/en/about-esco/escopedia/escopedia/european-e-competence-framework-e-cf [in English].

Mauvius Group Inc. (2021). The official guide to the Kanban method. Retrievsd from: https://kanban.university/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/The-Official-Kanban-Guide_Ukrainian_A4.pdf [in English].

QAA Subject Benchmark Statement for Computing. (2022). Retrievsd from: https://www.qaa.ac.uk/the-quality-code/subject-benchmark-statements/computing [in English].

Schwaber, K., & Sutherland, J. (2020). Complete Scrum tutorial: the rules of the game. Retrievsd from: https://scrumguides.org/docs/scrumguide/v2020/2020-Scrum-Guide-Ukrainian.pdf [in English].

User guide for the application of the European e-Competence Framework 3.0. CWA 16234-2:2014, part 2. Retrievsd from: https://www.myecole.it/biblio/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/User-guide-for-the-application-of-the-e-CF-3.0_CEN_CWA_16234-2_2014.pdf [in English].

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30