TO THE QUESTION OF BUILDING THE UNIVERSAL MODEL OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF WORLD PEDAGOGY AND EDUCATION

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35433/pedagogy.1(100).2020.5-14

Keywords:

historiography, historic and pedagogical process, creative pedagogical civilizations, pedagogical cultures, fractal-hologram modeling, universal dialectical model of world pedagogy and education development, systems analysis, triadic dialectical model of development of any phenomenon

Abstract

The purpose of the research is to build a universal dialectical model simulating the development of world pedagogy and education. The urgency of this task stems, on the one hand, from the system crisis of human civilization, and, on the other hand, from the need in building new educational meanings and methods enabling to overcome the crises.

The research methods are based on theoretical and methodological procedure of analyzing the problem field of the research by moving from the general to the specific, that is, from theoretical aspects of the problem field to its practical aspects. One more used method is fractal-holographic modeling that helps to unify the processes of pedagogy and education development on local and global historic levels. The extrapolation procedure of system-theoretical reduction and simplification of the analyzed phenomena is also used, since the systems analysis is a means of combating complexity, a means of finding the simple in the complex.

The universal models of pedagogy and education development on local and global levels are built. So, the results of the research, which reveal its scientific novelty, indicate that the unfolding of the studied dynamic phenomena can be represented as a single invariant process, which is simulated by a universal dialectical model, unifying this process due to the mechanism of fractal-holographic nesting of the stages of the development of any educational phenomenon. Thus, the understanding of unfolding the educational and pedagogical phenomena in historical context as certain invariant algorithmic dialectical process has been reached. Prospective directions for the study of these educational and pedagogical phenomena may be the researches focusing on more differentiated analysis of the problem field of the research. 

References

Aleksandrov, N.N. (2011). Genezis mental`nogo khronotopa. Kniga 1. Genezis predstavlenij o vremeni [Genesis of the mental chronotope. Book 1. The genesis of ideas about time]. Moskva: Izd-vo Akademii Trinitarizma, 53-55 [in Russian].

Bobry`shov, S.V. (2006). Soczial`no-ontologicheskie osnovaniya i soderzhanie paradigmal`ny`kh metodologicheskikh podkhodov v istoriko-pedagogicheskom issledovanii [Socio-ontological foundations and content of paradigmatic methodological approaches in historical and pedagogical research]. Nauchnaya my`sl` Kavkaza. Prilozhenie – Scientific Thought Caucasus. Attachment. 8, 360-371 [in Russian].

Bohuslavskyi, M.V. (1999). Struktura suchasnoho istoryko-pedahohichnoho protsesu [The structure of current historical and pedagogical process]. Shliakh osvity – Way of education, 1, 37-40 [in Ukrainian].

Bondarevskaya, E.V. (1999). Pedagogicheskaya kul`tura kak obshhestvennaya i lichnaya czennost` [Pedagogical culture as social and personal value]. Pedagogika – The pedagogy, 3, 39 [in Russian].

Vozniuk, O.V. (2014). Nova paradyhma modeliuvannia ta rozvytku istoryko-pedahohichnoho protsesu: monohrafiia [A new paradigm of modeling and development of the historical and pedagogical process: monograph]. Zhytomyr: Vyd-vo ZhDU im. I. Franka [in Ukrainian].

Hupan, N.M. (2000). Istoriohrafiia rozvytku istoryko-pedahohichnoi nauky v Ukraini [Historiography of the development of historical and pedagogical science in Ukraine]. Kyiv: Natsionalnyi pedahohichnyi universytet imeni M.P. Drahomanova [in Ukrainian].

Donchenko, O. (2001). Psykholohiia transpersonalnykh konstruktiv [Psychology of transpersonal constructs]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo – Psychology & Society, 3(5), 91-92 [in Ukrainian].

Kolesnikova, M.V. (1998). Sinergetika i` di`alog kul`tur [Synergetics and dialogue of cultures]. Di`alog kul`tur: Ukrayina u svi`tovomu konteksti`: Mistecztvo i` osvi`ta – Dialogue of cultures: Ukraine in the world context: Art and education. L`vi`v: Kamenyar, 3, 272-275 [in Ukrainian].

Kornetov, G.B. (2010). Prognosticheskie vozmozhnosti istoriko-pedagogicheskogo znaniya [Predictive capabilities of historical and pedagogical knowledge]. Istoriko-pedagogicheskij al`manakh VLADI – Historical and pedagogical almanac of VLADI, 4 (5), 75-96 [in Russian].

Kornetov, G.B. (1994). Czivilizaczionny`j podkhod k izucheniyu vsemirno-istoricheskogo proczessa [A civilizational approach to the study of the world historical process]. Moskwa: ITP i MIO RAO [in Russian].

Korsak, K.V. (2009). Pro mi`fologi`chni`st` ponyattya "osvi`ta" [On the mythological concept of "education"]. Naukovij svi`t – Scientific world, 4, 2-5 [in Ukrainian].

Kravczov, A.O. Pedagogicheskaya dejstvitel`nost` v kontekste polikriterial`nogo podkhoda k ee analizu [Pedagogical reality in the context of a multicriteria approach to its analysis]. Retrieved from http://ideashistory.org.ru/pdfs/29kravtsov.pdf [in Russian].

Kremen`, V.G. (2009). Fi`losofi`ya lyudinoczentrizmu v strategi`yakh osvi`tn`ogo prostoru: monografi`ya [Philosophy of Human Centrism in Educational Space Strategies: a monograph]. Kyiv: Ped. dumka [in Ukrainian].

Kudaev, M.R. (2008). Didakticheskij material dlya samopodgotovki k attestaczii po pedagogike [Didactic material for self-training for certification in pedagogy]. Majkop: Izd-vo AGU [in Russian].

Ravkin, Z.I., & Pryanikova, V.G. (2000). Gumanisticheskaya paradigma obrazovaniya i vospitaniya: teoreticheskie osnovy` i istoricheskij opy`t realizaczii (konecz XIX – 90-e gody` XX veka) [The humanistic paradigm of education and upbringing: theoretical foundations and historical experience of implementation (late 19th – 90s of the 20th century)]. Problemy` obrazovaniya i vospitaniya v kontekste gumanisticheskoj paradigmy` pedagogiki (konecz XIX – 90-e gody` XX veka) – Problems of education and upbringing in the context of the humanistic paradigm of pedagogy (end of the 19th – 90s of the 20th century), 1, 4-24 [in Russian].

Sbruieva, A.A., & Rysina, M.Iu. (2000). Istoriia pedahohiky u skhemakh, kartakh, diahramakh [History of pedagogy in schemes, maps, diagrams]. Sumy: SumDPU [in Ukrainian].

Semenova, A.V. (2009). Paradigmal`ne modelyuvannya u profesni`j pi`dgotovczi` majbutni`kh uchiteli`v: monografi`ya [Paradigm modeling in future teachers' vocational training: a monograph]. Odesa: "Yuridichna li`teratura" [in Ukrainian].

Sukhomlynska, O.V. (2003). Istoryko-pedahohichnyi protses: novi pidkhody do zahalnykh problem [Historical and pedagogical process: new approaches to common problems]. Kyiv: A.P.N. [in Ukrainian].

Tymchenko, A.A., & Zadoia, Ye.S. Osnovni metody, pryntsypy ta etapy tekhnolohii istoryko-pedahohichnoho doslidzhennia [Basic methods, principles and stages of technology of historical and pedagogical research]. Vestnyk. Nauka y praktyka – Bulletun. Science and practice. Retrieved from http://xn--e1aajfpcds8ay4h.com.ua/pages/view/557 [in Ukrainian].

Chernyak, Yu.A. (1975). Prostota slozhnogo [The simplicity of the complex]. Moskva: Znanie [in Russian].

Shhedroviczkij, P.G. (1993). Ocherki po filosofii obrazovaniya [Essays on Philosophy of Education]. Moskva: E`ksperiment [in Russian].

Ashby, W. Ross. (1956). An Introduction to Cybernetics. New York, J. Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.5851 [in English].

Mayers, E. (1960). Education in the perspective of history. New York [in English].

Downloads

Published

2020-05-31