IDENTIFYING BEST PRACTICES FOR IMPLEMENTING STUDY PROGRAMMES: THE EXPERIENCE OF THE NATIONAL AGENCY FOR HIGHER EDUCATION QUALITY ASSURANCE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35433/pedagogy.3(122).2025.1

Keywords:

assessment criteria, study programmes, best practice, Regulation of accreditation

Abstract

The article examines the problem of determining the exemplary nature of practices for implementing study programmes and educational activities under study programmes in terms of assessing the levels of compliance with the Criteria for Evaluating study programmes in accordance with the Regulations on the Accreditation of study programmes for the Training of Higher Education Applicants, approved by Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine on 15 May 2024 No. 686. The survey conducted and analyzed covered a range of recipients corresponding to the number and characteristics of study programmes considered by the National Agency for Higher Education. In particular, the survey included the identification of the specified practices as exemplary from the point of view of the recipients, which made it possible to establish the existence of a wide range of views among the educational community on the characteristics of exemplary practices. Thus, the vast majority of respondents identify exemplary and positive practices as predominantly exemplary. However, ordinary compliance with requirements was also often identified as exemplary practice, which shows the instability of the interpretation of the category of exemplarity in the assessment of study programmes. Along with this, the issue of the need to unify the approach to the assessment of study programmes and identify best practices in their implementation is relevant. To this end, it is particularly important to develop and systematize the characteristics of best practices, especially in the sectoral context.

References

Metodychni rekomendatsii dlia ekspertiv Natsionalnoho ahentstva shchodo zastosuvannia Kryteriiv otsiniuvannia yakosti osvitnoi prohramy, zatverdzheni protokolom Natsionalnoho ahentstva iz zabezpechennia yakosti vyshchoi osvity vid 23.12.2019 № 9 [Methodological recommendations for experts of the National Agency on the application of the Criteria for assessing the quality of an study programme, approved by the protocol of the National Agency for Quality Assurance of Higher Education dated 12/23/2019 No. 9] [in Ukrainian].

Polozhennia pro akredytatsiiu osvitnikh prohram, za yakymy zdiisniuietsia pidhotovka zdobuvachiv vyshchoi osvity, zatverdzhene Nakaz Ministerstva osvity i nauky Ukrainy vid 15 travnia 2024 roku № 686 [Regulations on the accreditation of study programmes for which higher education applicants are trained, approved by the Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine dated May 15, 2024 No. 686] [in Ukrainian].

Richnyi zvit Natsionalnoho ahentstva iz zabezpechennia yakosti vyshchoi osvity za 2019 rik [Annual report of the National Agency for Quality Assurance of Higher Education for 2019] / za zah. red. S. Kvita. (2020). Kyiv: Natsionalne ahentstvo iz zabezpechennia yakosti vyshchoi osvity, 244. Retrieved from: https://naqa.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Report-2020.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Richnyi zvit Natsionalnoho ahentstva iz zabezpechennia yakosti vyshchoi osvity za 2020 rik [Annual report of the National Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education for 2020] / za zah. red. S. Kvita, & O. Yeremenko. (2021). Kyiv: Natsionalne ahentstvo iz zabezpechennia yakosti vyshchoi osvity, 364. Retrieved from: https://naqa.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Annual-report-2020.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Richnyi zvit Natsionalnoho ahentstva iz zabezpechennia yakosti vyshchoi osvity za 2021 rik [Annual report of the National Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education for 2021] / za zah. red. S. Kvita. (2022). Kyiv: Natsionalne ahentstvo iz zabezpechennia yakosti vyshchoi osvity, 232. Retrieved from: https://naqa.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Report-2021.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Richnyi zvit Natsionalnoho ahentstva iz zabezpechennia yakosti vyshchoi osvity za 2022 rik [Annual report of the National Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education for 2022] / za zah. red. A. Butenka, & O. Yeremenko. (2023). Kyiv: Natsionalne ahentstvo iz zabezpechennia yakosti vyshchoi osvity, 111. Retrieved from: https://naqa.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Annual report-2022-рік.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Richnyi zvit Natsionalnoho ahentstva iz zabezpechennia yakosti vyshchoi osvity za 2023 rik [Annual report of the National Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education for 2023] / za red. A. Butenka, O. Yeremenko, & N. Stukalo. (2024). Kyiv: Natsionalne ahentstvo iz zabezpechennia yakosti vyshchoi osvity, 108. Retrieved from: https://naqa.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Report-2023.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Richnyi zvit Natsionalnoho ahentstva iz zabezpechennia yakosti vyshchoi osvity za 2024 rik [Annual report of the National Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education for 2024] / za red. A. Butenka, O. Yeremenko, & N. Stukalo. (2025). Kyiv: Natsionalne ahentstvo iz zabezpechennia yakosti vyshchoi osvity, 154. Retrieved from: https://naqa.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Annual-report-2024.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Roziasnennia shchodo zastosuvannia Kryteriiv otsiniuvannia yakosti osvitnoi prohramy [Clarifications on the application of the Criteria for assessing the quality of a study programme]: metod. posibnyk [elektronne vydannia] / A. Butenko, H. Denyskina, O. Yeremenko, O. Knysh, I. Simshah, & O. Trebenko. (2024). Kyiv: Natsionalne ahentstvo iz zabezpechennia yakosti vyshchoi osvity, 127 [in Ukrainian].

Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG). (2015). Brussels, Belgium, 32 [in English].

Akredytatsiini spravy [Accreditation matters]. Retrieved from: https://public.naqa.gov.ua/?_gl=1*1n66uqp*_ga*MjA2ODI1MDM3MC4xNzMyOTE0MDY5*_ga_8PE503NFSB*czE3NTcxNjg5ODYkbzY3JGcxJHQxNzU3MTY5MDQyJGo0JGwwJGgw [in Ukrainian].

Downloads

Published

2025-09-26