RESEARCH ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF AN EDUCATIONAL SIMULATOR DESIGNED IN UNITY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35433/pedagogy.3(122).2025.23

Keywords:

educational simulator, unity engine, adaptive learning, mathematical modeling, dynamic processes, gamification, adaptive algorithm, learning effectiveness, serious games, customized learning

Abstract

The article investigates the effectiveness of an educational simulator designed on the Unity platform, which integrates an adaptive mathematical model to manage dynamic learning processes. The study's relevance stems from the limitations of traditional teaching methods (low individualization, high resource demands) and the need for flexible, interactive environments to enhance motivation and knowledge acquisition. The Unity engine was chosen for its cross-platform capability, support for physics modeling, and comprehensive tools for creating VR/AR applications.
The main goal was to evaluate the simulator's efficiency compared to traditional learning methods. To achieve this, an adaptive model based on logistic and differential equations was developed, which dynamically adjusts task parameters–specifically difficulty (α), player level (L), and experience (EXP)—according to the user's success rate (S). The mathematical model was implemented using Python libraries (NumPy, SciPy) for computation and C# within the Unity environment for visualization and interactive behavior.
A series of numerical simulations across three typical user scenarios (high, medium, and low success rates) confirmed the adaptability and robustness of the algorithm. The analysis of the plots showed that in the high success scenario, task difficulty grew monotonically, and experience accumulation was the fastest. In the low success scenario, the model promptly reduced the difficulty, thereby preventing user frustration and maintaining motivation.
Model validation using metrics indicated high accuracy: the coefficient of determination R2 was ≈0.92, and the Mean Absolute Error (MAE) was 0.15–0.25, confirming a high correlation between the modeled curve and the empirical pattern of learning progress. A comparative experiment between simulator-based and traditional learning demonstrated an increase in academic performance by 18–22% and a 15% reduction in task completion time. The practical significance of this work lies in providing a foundation for flexible educational platforms capable of personalizing learning content and sustaining an optimal cognitive load. Future work includes integrating deep learning methods, expanding functionality with VR/AR, and scaling the experiment to a larger user base.

References

Bohdanova, M.V. (2023). Heimifikatsiia osvitnoho protsesu yak zasib rozvytku krytychnoho myslennia starshoklasnykiv [Gamification of the educational process as a means of developing critical thinking of high school students]. Naukovyi visnyk – Scientific Bulletin, 5(14), 45-58 [in Ukrainian].

Tkachenko, I.A., & Moroz, V.R. (2022). Ihrovi tekhnolohii v osviti: teoriia i praktyka [Game technologies in education: theory and practice]. Kharkiv: Nova knyha [in Ukrainian].

Hamari, J., & Koivisto, J. (2022). Why do people use gamification services? International Journal of Information Management, 35(4), 419-431 [in English].

Kapp, K.M. (2023). The gamification of learning and instruction: Game-based methods and strategies for training and education. San Francisco: Wiley [in English].

Pedersen, M.K., et al. (2016). DiffGame: Game-based mathematics learning for physics. Physics Education. Retrieved from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.08016 [in English].

Hagler, S., Jimison, H.B., & Pavel, M. (2016). Assessing executive function using a computer game: Computational modeling of cognitive processes. Quantitative Methods. Retrieved from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.03828[in English].

Kostić, V., & Sekulić, T. (2022). GeoGebra dynamic software as mathematical modeling support in engineering education. Knowledge – International Journal, 55(3), 461-467 [in English].

Kovtaniuk, M.S., Shokaliuk, S.V., & Stepanyuk, A.N. (2025). Game simulators as educational tools for developing algorithmic thinking skills in computer science education. CTE Workshop Proceedings, 12, 19-62 [in English].

Durkin, K., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2015). Using video games to combine learning and assessment in mathematics education. International Journal of Serious Games, 2(4), 3-17 [in English].

Vlasyuk, A.P., & Martyniuk, P.M. (2017). Mathematical modeling and computer simulation of the filtration processes in earth dams. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2(10), 2-16 [in English].

Bottino, R.M., & Ott, M. (2006). Developing strategic and reasoning abilities with computer games at primary school level. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1272-1286 [in English].

Ke, F. (2007). Game and decision theory in mathematics education: epistemological, cognitive and didactical perspectives. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 39, 51-61 [in English].

Ziatdinov, R., & Valles, Jr.J.R. (2022). Synthesis of modeling, visualization, and programming in GeoGebra as an effective approach for teaching and learning STEM topics. Mathematics, 10(3), Article 398 [in English].

Downloads

Published

2025-09-26